Roman Infant Burial Contradicts Dogma of Disposing Babies Without Ceremony.

Archeologists digging at France’s Clermont-Ferrand Airport have discovered the remains of a 2,000-year-old, upper-class, Roman baby and his pet dog. This rare Roman baby burial discovery further challenges traditional ideas that Romans unceremoniously disposed of their children.


Archaeologists were conducting excavations before airport construction works when they came across the Roman baby burial. (Denis Gliksman /  INRAP)

Archaeologists from  France’s National Institute of Preventive Archaeological Research  (INRAP) announced on Thursday that they have discovered the grave of the small child during a dig at the Clermont-Ferrand Airport, in Aulnat (Puy-de-Dôme), in central France. According to a report in  The Guardian , the burial included twenty containers, glass vases and the milk tooth of another child. This mysterious “ritual child burial” has been dated back to the Roman period, about 2,000 years ago.

What makes it unique is that the baby was buried with what appears to be its  pet dog , with a bell collar. What’s more, the child’s coffin was found in a 6-by-3-foot grave (1.8 by 0.9 meters) with twenty objects that had been ritually placed around the child’s body. Among the grave goods were twenty terracotta vases and glass pots, two headless chickens, half a pig, three hams and other pork cuts also added to the burial. The conclusion: this was one seriously rich Roman kid.


Archaeologists excavating the Roman baby burial. (Denis Gliksman /  INRAP)

A report in  AW-Journal says this rare discovery of a Roman baby burial took place in December 2020 during preventive excavations conducted by INRAP at the behest of the State and the  Drac Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes , upstream of new construction works planned at the  Clermont-Ferrand Airport . The researchers think the child was only about one year old when it died. They also discovered the skeletal remains of “a pet dog” buried alongside the child.

The place, or role, of children within Roman social structure was complex and they were treated distinctly differently from adults, in life and in death. According to a paper on  Taylor Francis Online , children in Roman literary sources received “special protections under the law until the age of seven.” In the archaeological record Roman children are most often found buried differently from adults. By analyzing these differences in  burial rituals , researchers can reach certain conclusions about general cultural distinctions that influenced the Roman concept of  childhood and the resulting  Roman burial customs .


Archaeologists at work during the excavation of the Roman child burial. (Denis Gliksman /  INRAP)

This particular Roman baby lived just decades after the alleged birth of Jesus during the reign of either  Emperor Augustus  (27 BC to 14 AD) or Tiberius (14 to 37 AD). In an article in the  Daily Mail , a spokesperson from  INRAP, Dr. Lautier, is reported to have explained that toddlers rarely benefit from the same funeral practices as their elders, who in the Roman period were generally cremated. Furthermore, the archaeologist said the graves of young Gallo-Roman children are often “located outside the community funeral home and sometimes even buried near the family home.”

The child’s grave is said to be “quite exceptional” both in its size and because of the quality of the ritually added grave goods that have been recovered. But perhaps the biggest indicator of the baby’s high  social class  was the profusion butchered meats and over twenty food vessels. In comparison, the institute said that in excavations of this type of tomb archaeologists generally find “one or two pots placed at the foot.” The child had clearly come from a family “that was very rich,” said Dr. Lautier.


The Roman baby burial included an infant skeleton, surrounded by a pet dog, a pig, twenty terracotta vases and various food and meat offerings. (Denis Gliksman /  INRAP)

In 1993, Dr. Martin Millett from the Faculty of Classics at the University of Cambridge, and Dr. Rebecca Gowland from the Department of Archaeology at Durham University, published the research paper titled  Infant and child burial rites in Roman Britain: a study from East Yorkshire . The researchers wrote about the discovery of  infant burials  on excavated domestic sites in Roman Britain and said that, in the past, these burials have often been dismissed as “a product of unceremonious disposal.”

Traditionally, this phenomenon of the “unceremonious disposal” of Roman children was taken as evidence for mass  infanticide in the Roman world . However, in this 1993 paper, new evidence was presented from two large groups of infant burials in East Yorkshire, in England, that demonstrated how Roman baby  burials of neonatal infants followed “a careful age specific funerary rite.” The researchers concluded that child rituals were definitely performed, and this finding “further undermines the widespread assumption that infants were disposed of without ceremony and as a result of infanticide” by Roman adults.


Once the vases were removed during the excavation, the archaeologists had a better view of the infant skeleton surrounded by a pet dog and a pig. (Ivy Thomson /  INRAP)

Let’s return to the discovery of the Roman baby burial of an infant with its  pet dog  and all those meats in France. Just like the child graves discovered in England, this discovery pays testament to the complexity of Roman society and suggests that Romans didn’t “unceremonious dispose” of dead children. On the contrary, children were “sometimes” buried with great pomp and ceremony.

However, it has to be added that the research presented by Millett and Gowland in 1993, and again now, pertaining to  child burial rituals , is all from upper class Roman society. Perhaps ritual child burials, with the inclusion of meats and vessels, was an upper-class thing, while it was greatly different among families in lower classes, where there was little of value, including food, to be spared for inclusion in their  child burials .

Comment Disabled for this post!